Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05494294
Comparison of Different De-epithelialization Techniques of Soft Tissue Grafts.
Does the De-epithelialization Procedure Affect the Epithelial Remnants and Recession Coverage Outcomes?
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hacettepe University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
In this randomized comparative controlled clinical trial, 50 patients with single recession defects with thin phenotype were treated with coronally advanced flap. The connective tissue graft was obtained by removing the keratinized layer of the tissue. Removal of the epithelium was achieved by to different approach. At first group epithelium and remnants were removed extraorally whereas others were intraorally. After the removal, obtained graft laid on a lamella, and residual keratinocytes were observed under the microscope. Amount of recession reduction recorded at the 6th week, 6th month, 12th month, and keratinized tissue height, gingival thickness, recession depth, recession width, probing depth, and clinical attachment level, were also evaluated. Keratinized tissue change, Gingival thickness change, root coverage, clinical attachment gain, and complete root coverage were calculated. Wound healing index, tissue appearance, patient expectations, aesthetics, and dentine hypersensitivity were assessed at baseline and 6th week.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Intraorally de-epithelialization | In this group, the grafts were de-epithelialized at the donor site before harvesting. The calibrated surgeon removed the epithelium with a sharp Kirkland knife under magnification. To be sure of the elimination whole epithelial layer, bleeding was observed. Recipient site was prepared as follows; A after sulculer incision had done (blade 15c) two vertical incions were made from the gingival margin to 3 mm beyond the mucogingival junction A partial-thickness flap was elevated under the recession area and full thickness flap elevated adjacent flap portions. then relasing incisions were made apically from the mucogingival junction. After the preparation of the recipient site, obtained graft was sutured 1 mm apically to the cemento-enamel junction. Finally flap was positioned without tension and stabilized at least 2mm coronally from the cemento-enamel margin with the single interrupted sutures. |
| PROCEDURE | Extraorally de-epithelialization | In this group, the grafts were de-epithelialized after graft harvesting. The calibrated surgeon removed the epithelium with 15 c knife under magnification. all remnants were removed under magnification. Same recipient site procedure was conducted in this group. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2021-07-04
- Primary completion
- 2022-07-30
- Completion
- 2022-08-05
- First posted
- 2022-08-09
- Last updated
- 2022-08-11
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05494294. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.