Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05487196

Effectiveness of Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, and Fentanyl Adjuncts for Labor Epidural Analgesia

Effectiveness of Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, and Fentanyl Adjuncts for Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Quadruple Blinded Non-Inferiority Trial (CLASSIER Trial)

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88 (actual)
Sponsor
Grace Lim, MD, MS · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of epidural clonidine, dexmedetomidine, or fentanyl adjuncts for labor analgesia.

Detailed description

Adjuncts for epidural labor analgesia have remained unchanged for decades, whereas changes in patient population and the opioid epidemic have created an increased demand for non-opioid alternative adjuncts to limit peripartum opioid exposure. This study aims to identify effective alternative and non-opioid adjunctive agents for epidural labor analgesia. The opioid crisis in the United States has translated to an increasing number of pregnant women requiring care for labor and delivery. These trends have resulted in new questions about alternative epidural analgesia adjuncts besides lipophilic opioids (e.g., fentanyl and sufentanil) because: 1) many people with opioid or substance use disorder desire to avoid opioids in all formulations and routes of administration; and 2) epidural fentanyl or sufentanil administration for labor can potentially interfere with the accuracy of urine drug screening in the postpartum period, which has implications for postpartum social services considerations. Some existing literature suggests that dexmedetomidine and clonidine are viable adjuncts to local anesthetics that offer a faster onset and a better quality of analgesia for patients requiring labor analgesia. However, the relative effectiveness of these adjunctive agents for labor analgesia have not been compared head-to-head. Better data on how these adjuncts compare with each other for labor analgesia efficacy, can result in more informed clinical care strategies. This trial was initially initiated as a superiority design. After further scientific input, it was decided that a non-inferiority design would be more informative for the clinical question at hand. The hypothesis is that clonidine (Group C) and dexmedetomidine (Group D) are non-inferior to fentanyl (Group F) (usual care) as adjuncts for epidural labor analgesia. The null hypothesis is that clonidine and dexmedetomidine are inferior to fentanyl as adjuncts for epidural labor analgesia. Clinical Protocol specific methodology did not change throughout the trial and the full trial protocol document can be found in the relevant section below. An updated statistical analysis plan includes updated sample size calculations and has been reported to account for the noninferiority analysis plan. No data was analyzed prior to the completion of all data collection procedures.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGClonidineClonidine belongs to the drug classification of antihypertensives
DRUGDexmedetomidineDexmedetomidine belongs to the drug classification of sedatives
DRUGFentanylFentanyl belongs to the drug classification of analgesic opioid agonists and is used as the standard of care
DRUGRopivacaineRopivacaine belongs to the drug classification of local or regional anesthesia for surgery and is used as standard of care

Timeline

Start date
2022-09-28
Primary completion
2023-07-31
Completion
2023-07-31
First posted
2022-08-04
Last updated
2025-04-27
Results posted
2025-04-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05487196. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.