Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT05472987
Robotic Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair
Robotic Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Lucas Beffa · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This is a randomized trial comparing open retromuscular ventral hernia repair to robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair.
Detailed description
This is a randomized trial comparing open retromuscular ventral hernia repair to robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. This is a superiority trial with a primary outcome of length of stay in the hospital, theorizing that robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repairs are superior to open ventral hernia repairs by reducing length of stay by 24 hours. Patients will be blinded to the intervention, groups will be in parallel, and the primary outcome (when the patient is discharged) will be determined by a blinded assessor.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Ventral Hernia Repair | Patients will undergo retromuscular ventral hernia repair |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-07-25
- Primary completion
- 2027-08-01
- Completion
- 2027-08-01
- First posted
- 2022-07-25
- Last updated
- 2025-10-07
Locations
4 sites across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05472987. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.