Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT05429216
Endoscopic Resection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
Modified Cap-assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Less Than 1 cm: a Muticenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 102 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
In previous single center study, both modified cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (mEMR-C) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were reported to be effective for the treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and mEMR-C was inferior to ESD for the treatment of small rectal NETs (≤10 mm), as it has shorter operation times and lower hospitalization costs. However, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is needed to prove the universality and generality of these findings.
Detailed description
Investigators aimed to conduct a muticenter randomized controlled trial to compare mEMR-C with ESD for the treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in six tertiary hospitals in China.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | mEMR-C procedure | A transparent cap with an inner groove (MH-593; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the forward-viewing colonoscope. After the endoscope was inserted into the rectum, a crescent-shaped electrosurgical snare was passed through the sheath and looped along the inner groove of the cap. Submucosal injections were not required in this method. The tumor was suctioned into the cap and grasped by tightening the snare. After confirming the appropriate snare placement, both the tumor and overlying mucosa were resected using electric cautery (Endocut Q, effect 2, VIO 200D; ERBE, Tübingen, Germany), and the resected tumor was sent for pathological examination. Endoscopic examination was repeated without a transparent cap to evaluate the wound carefully in cases of perforation or bleeding and to ensure the absence of residual tumor tissues. If there was spurting or active bleeding, hot forceps were used to stop the bleeding. |
| PROCEDURE | ESD procedure | ESD was performed as the standard procedure and has been widely described and used. First, dots were marked approximately 5 mm from the periphery of the lesion using coagulation. Subsequently, a diluted sodium hyaluronate solution with indigo carmine dye was injected submucosally. Mucosal incision and submucosal dissection were performed using a T-Type ESD Knife (Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) or Dual-knife (Olympus Medical, Tokyo, Japan). After resection was completed, all visible vessels on the artificial wound were thoroughly coagulated to prevent postoperative bleeding. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
- First posted
- 2022-06-23
- Last updated
- 2022-07-01
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05429216. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.