Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05415787
Evaluation of the Technical Feasibility of Testing ct DNA for Homologous Recombination Gene Variants in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Evaluation of the Technical Feasibility of Testing Circulating Tumour DNA for Homologous Recombination Gene Variants in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 40 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Tours · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Evaluation of technical feasibility for Homologous Recombination (HR) genes variants research on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma and urine of patients with a metastatic prostate cancer.
Detailed description
The benefit of PARPi has been well established for ovarian (SOLO-1 study) and prostate cancer (PROFOUND study) with defects in the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) system due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants. Somatic variants in HRR genes are currently researched by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). However, in metastatic prostate cancer, using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, failure rate is around 30 % according to our retrospective datas, in agreement with the data of the PROFOUND study, highlighting a real pre-analytical matter when FFPE samples are used for NGS testing. Research of such alterations on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from plasma or urine could be a promising alternative test.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Blood sample | 2 tubes Cell free DNA are taken during a blood sample already planned in the patient's care. |
| OTHER | Urine sample | Urine sample is taken during the consultation carried out for the patient's care |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-08-18
- Primary completion
- 2024-01-17
- Completion
- 2024-01-18
- First posted
- 2022-06-13
- Last updated
- 2024-03-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05415787. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.