NCT05413603

Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization

Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization for Pediatric Renal Stones.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 100 (actual)
• Sponsor: Egymedicalpedia · Industry
• Sex: All
• Age: 2 Years – 16 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Epidemiological studies have shown a progressive increase in the incidence of pediatric urolithiasis over the past few decades.

Detailed description

Pediatric stone disease is considered endemic in developing nations including Turkey, Pakistan, and eastern countries. The introduction of SWL by Chaussy et al. in the early 1980s revolutionized the management of upper urinary tract calculus disease. Reports of successful SWL in children were first published in 1986; then several reports showed safety, and stone-free rates comparable with those of adults. For successful SWL, accurate localization of the shock waves is performed by ultrasound (US) or fluoroscope (FS) to fully focus the shock waves on the stone

Conditions

• Stone, Kidney
• Child, Only

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	ultrasonic focus Shock wave lithotripsy	successful Shock wave lithotripsy , accurate localization of the shock waves is performed by ultrasound (US) to fully focus the shock waves on the stone
PROCEDURE	fluoroscopic focus Shock wave lithotripsy	successful Shock wave lithotripsy , accurate localization of the shock waves is performed by fluoroscope (FS) to fully focus the shock waves on the stone

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-05-25
• Primary completion: 2023-05-25
• Completion: 2023-05-30
• First posted: 2022-06-10
• Last updated: 2023-07-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt