Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05413031
Comparing Relative Motion Splint With Static Splint After Hand Extensor Tendon Repair
Treatment of Finger Extensor Tendon Rupture - Comparison Between Static and Relative Motion Splints
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 26 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Rambam Health Care Campus · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Different splints are used after hand extensor tendon repair (including relative motion splint, static splint, etc.) There is no consensus regarding the benefits of either one. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes after using different orthoses and rehabilitation methods after hand extensor tendon repair. Patients are randomly assigned after signing consent to either immobilization with a static splint or a relative motion splint. Patients are examined after 2 and 5 months postoperatively for finger range of motion, grip strength, and DASH questionnaire.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | relative motion splint | splint with ability to move the fingers |
| DEVICE | static splint | splint with immobility of wrist, and fingers |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-01-30
- Primary completion
- 2021-02-27
- Completion
- 2021-03-30
- First posted
- 2022-06-09
- Last updated
- 2022-06-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Israel
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05413031. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.