Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05402917

Comparison of the Efficacy of Erector Spina Plane Block and Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Thoracotomy

Comparison of Post-operative Analgesia Efficacy of Erector Spina Plan Block (ESPB) and Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) in Patients Undergoing Lobectomy With Thoracotomy Incision

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Mesut Aslan · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In patients who undergoing lobectomy with thoracotomy incision, the effectiveness of erector spina plane block in post-operative analgesia management is at least as much as thoracic epidural anesthesia.

Detailed description

Observational recording of the data was planned by dividing the patients who met the internal criteria of the study and whose written and verbal consents were obtained for the study, into two groups as the patients applied ESPB or TEA. ESPB and TEA are applied to patients in our clinic depending on the preference of the physician. The routine procedures in ESPB and TEA are described in groups part. For this study, no procedure or intervention other than this routine will be performed, and the research will be conducted observationally. Anesthesia induction for both groups will be performed with standard monitors, electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation probe and non-invasive automatic blood pressure/invasive arterial monitoring in the operating room. Anesthesia induction will be performed with 2 mg/kg propofol, 2 mcg/kg fentanyl and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium with 1.5 mg/kg IV lidocaine, followed by double lumen endotracheal intubation and positive pressure mechanical ventilation with controlled positive 50% inspired oxygen. Ventilation parameters will be adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide around 35 mmHg. Anesthesia will be maintained with end-tidal sevoflurane 0.7-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (adjusted for hemodynamics) 0.15 mg/kg rocuronium and 0.05-0.2 mcg/kg/min remifentanil (adjusted for hemodynamics). Acetaminophen (1 g paracetamol) IV will be administered to all patients 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, heart rate, end-pulmonary carbon dioxide value and mac value of the patients will be recorded before and after block application, before and after anesthesia induction, every 15 minutes in the first hour and every 30 minutes after the first hour. Patients will be extubated with 0.03 mg/kg atropine and 0.07 mg/kg neostigmine at the end of surgery. Hemodynamic and resting Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values for both groups taken to the post-operative intensive care unit will be recorded by nurse or anesthesia assistant at 0,2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours after their admittance to the intensive care unit. In combination with the numerical pain scale, the Wong-Baker face pain scale (FS) will be used for the postoperative pain assessment of the patient. The pain assessment form will have six faces representing pain along with numbers 0 to 10, with 0 for no pain and 10 for being unbearable pain. Post-operative nausea, vomiting and any complications related to the block will be reported. Patients in the two groups will be evaluated with the VAS score for the pain they describe and record; VAS 0-4 will be classified as mild, VAS 5-7 as moderate, VAS 8-10 as severe pain. In patients with VAS \>4, additional analgesia will be given with IV non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (20 mg tenoxicam); after 30 minutes, VAS scoring will be evaluated again and IV tramadol 2 mg/kg (not to exceed a maximum of 100 mg once and not to exceed a maximum of 400 mg daily) will be administered in addition to patients with VAS\>4. Additional analgesia amounts and hours used will be recorded.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREErector Spinae Plane BlockInterfascial plane (area) blocks are blocks in which the local anesthetic agent is injected into the potential area between the two fasciae. The ESPB we used in our study is a member of interfascial plane blocks. The erector is applied between the spinal muscle and the transverse process, spreading the drug from the injection site to both cranial and caudal. Unlike other defined interfascial plane blocks, ESPB can show paraspinal block characteristics since the injection site is above the transverse process.

Timeline

Start date
2022-02-01
Primary completion
2022-12-01
Completion
2023-01-01
First posted
2022-06-02
Last updated
2024-05-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05402917. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.