Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05402618
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for PHC
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma(PHC)：A Multicenter Real-world Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 783 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Renyi Qin · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Brief Summary: This is a multicentric, retrospective, real-world study to investigate the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), with the perioperative characteristics and long-term overall survival being compared. We aimed to find out whether the minimally invasive surgery is safe or feasible for PHC. And we also want to find out patients with what kind of characteristic can be benefit from the minimally invasive surgery compared with the open approach.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | No intervention | This is an observational study without any intervention. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-01-01
- Completion
- 2022-04-01
- First posted
- 2022-06-02
- Last updated
- 2022-06-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05402618. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.