NCT05401994

Screw Retained Arch Bar Versus Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (actual)
• Sponsor: Mansoura University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 50 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

A randomized prospective clinical study to compare screw Retained Arch Bar and Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation

Detailed description

2\) Patients with non-pathological favorable or non-favorable fracture of mandible or maxilla that can be treated by MMF when acceptable occlusion can be obtained via bimanual reduction will be divided randomly into two equal groups: Group I: 10 patients will receive conventional Erich's arch bar. Group II: 10 patients will receive modified screw retained arch bar.

Conditions

• Mandibular Fractures

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	screw retained arch bar	maxillomandibular fixation with bone screwed arch bar
PROCEDURE	conventional Erich's Arch Bar	maxillomandibular fixation with conventional arch bar fixed to the teeth

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-09-01
• Primary completion: 2023-02-01
• Completion: 2023-02-01
• First posted: 2022-06-02
• Last updated: 2023-04-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt