NCT05385133

Condyle Repositioning Using PSI and Prebent Plates Osteosynthesis Versus Conventional Mandibular BSSO Set-back Surgery

Condyle Repositioning Using Patient Specific Guides and Prebent Plates Osteosynthesis Versus Conventional Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Set-back Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (actual)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 17 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Patients with skeletal class III malocclusion were allocated to two groups. Both proximal and distal segments were repositioned using osteotomy/screw holes and plate locating surgical guides with pre-bent plates osteosynthesis in the intervention group, while manual free hand condylar segment seating was used for proximal segment positioning in the control group.

Detailed description

Twenty patients with skeletal class III malocclusion were randomly allocated to two groups. Both proximal and distal segments were repositioned using osteotomy/screw holes and plate locating surgical guides with pre-bent plates osteosynthesis in the intervention group, while manual free hand condylar segment seating was used for proximal segment positioning in the control group. Accuracy of condylar position was assessed using computed tomography.

Conditions

• Orthognathic Surgery

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Computer guided condylar position	post-osteotomy condylar position was performed using patient specific surgical guides and pre-bent plates
PROCEDURE	Manual condylar position	post-osteotomy condylar position was performed using the conventional manual method

Timeline

• Start date: 2019-08-01
• Primary completion: 2022-01-20
• Completion: 2022-01-20
• First posted: 2022-05-23
• Last updated: 2022-05-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt