Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05370690

Retrospective Comparison of the Efficacy of Methotrexate and Azathioprine as Background Treatment for Uveitis of Undetermined Origin: Single-centre Retrospective Study From 2005 to 2020

Status
Unknown
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
70 (estimated)
Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Retrospective study at the Brest universitary hospital to evaluate the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and azathioprine (AZA) in background treatment of unidentified non anterior uveitis.

Detailed description

Uveitis is a major cause of ocular damage, responsible for 5 to 10% of blindness in the world. More broadly, up to 35% of patients with uveitis have visual acuity impairment ranging from "significant" to "legal blindness" \[4\]. The figures of "legal blindness" up to 25% according to the studies The objective of any anti-inflammatory therapy strategy for uveitis is to: * Quickly control eye inflammation to minimize irreversible structural damage and maintain visual function. * Prevent inflammatory recurrences, which cause complications and co-morbidity. * Limit the use of systemic corticosteroids over the course of their deleterious metabolic effects. * Optimize the risk-benefit balance and promote compliance. The studies concerning uveitis linked with another disease are multiple and are therefore well documented. Uveitis of undetermined origin is classified, by definition, as uveitis of non-infectious origin. Anterior uveitis are available for local treatment prior to any discussion of introducing systemic treatment. Intermediate uveitis, posterior and panuveitis justify systemic treatment. Systemic treatments used in these uveitis are METHOTREXATE, AZATHIOPRINE, MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL CICLOSPORINE, INTERFERON ALPHA, anti-TNF alpha. Antimetabolites (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate) are the most commonly used immunosuppressants. Several randomized studies (retrospective or prospective) compared the use of METHOTREXATE (MTX) and MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL (MMF), in the management of non-infectious inflammatory ocular disease as a corticosteroid-sparing treatment. Although MMF has a faster response time compared to MTX for inflammation control, the success rate is equivalent. These studies found no superiority of one molecule over the other . There are no studies in the literature comparing the use of MTX versus AZA in treatment of these non-prior uveitis of undetermined origin. These two molecules are frequently used in our center as first-line treatment of idiopathic uveitis in an undifferentiated way. The objective of this study is therefore to determine whether one of these molecules should be preferred for the management of our patients.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2022-05-01
Primary completion
2022-11-01
Completion
2022-11-01
First posted
2022-05-11
Last updated
2022-05-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05370690. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.