Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05359575

Three Instructional Interventions for Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization by Laypeople

Measuring the Effectiveness of Three Instructional Interventions for Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization by Laypeople: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
265 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Michigan · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

It is not known if bystanders equipped with point-of-care (POC) instruction are as effective as bystanders with in-person training for c-spine immobilization. Therefore, POC instructional interventions were developed during this study in response to the scalability challenges associated with in-person training to measure the comparative effectiveness and skill retention of POC instructions vs in-person training using a randomized clinical trial design.

Detailed description

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are the largest contributor to the global injury burden, which disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is the highest contributor to years lived disabled (YLDs) resulting from RTIs, accounting for 74.8% of YLDs from RTI. With a lack of robust emergency medical services (EMS), there has been increasing reliance on layperson bystanders to respond to RTIs in LMICs. Early spinal immobilization has the potential to limit neurological deficits secondary to TSCI and morbidity. Bystanders may be trained in-person or point-of-care (POC) instruction may be provided, as exists with automated external defibrillators and tourniquets. However, it is unknown if bystanders equipped with POC instruction are as effective as bystanders with in-person training for c-spine immobilization. Therefore, POC instructional interventions were developed in response to the scalability challenges associated with in-person training to measure the comparative effectiveness and skill retention of POC instructions vs in-person training using a randomized clinical trial design. The POC instructional flashcard was first piloted with an initial cohort of participants who were not assigned to any longitudinal follow-up date to pilot POC instructional interventions for c-spine immobilization and receive feedback for instructional flashcard revision prior to launching the "trial." Data from these participants is not considered part of the "trial" for analytic purposes. This entire testing process is with participants who are healthy volunteers and researchers simulating spinal injury victims to test which method of instruction is most effective and durable for understanding.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
BEHAVIORALAudio kitMP3 audio files for each of 6 steps of c-collar application (totaling 1 minute, 19 seconds) and instructional flashcard with seven pictures corresponding to each of the 6 steps of c-collar application
BEHAVIORALInstructional flashcard (version 1)Single page with 7 pictures corresponding to each of the 6 steps of cervical collar (c-collar) application.
BEHAVIORALIn-person training10 minute of an LFR spinal immobilization course (extracted from the current LFR Level 1 trauma course).
BEHAVIORALInstructional flashcard (version 2)Single page with 7 pictures corresponding to each of the 6 steps of cervical collar (c-collar) application edited for clarity based on initial pilot feedback.

Timeline

Start date
2022-02-07
Primary completion
2022-04-29
Completion
2022-04-29
First posted
2022-05-04
Last updated
2022-07-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05359575. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.