Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05356689

Patient Specific 3-Dimensional And 2-Dimensional Lumbar Traction In Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy

Comparative Effects Of Patient Specific 3-Dimensional And 2-Dimensional Lumbar Traction On Pain And Functional Disability In Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26 (estimated)
Sponsor
Riphah International University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
30 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The aim of study will be comparative effectiveness of the 2d and 3d lumbar traction on pain and functional disability in lumbar radiculopathy. This study will be useful for the physiotherapists to know which traction equipment will be more effective for the treatment of the lumbar radiculopathy

Detailed description

In one studied the effect of patient-specific three-dimensional lumbar traction on pain and functional disability in individuals with lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Twenty-five participants (age range: 34-67 years) diagnosed with lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse were included in this study. Patient-specific three-dimensional lumbar traction was given as three sessions per week for the duration of one month. All participants completed a 10-cm visual analog pain scale and pain pressure threshold to assess pain and the Oswestry disability index to assess the functional disability. Twelve sessions of patient-specific three-dimensional lumbar traction promoted a reduction in pain and improvement in functional disability among subjects with lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse.Another studied to evaluate the effectiveness of traction in improving low back pain, functional outcome, and disk morphology in patients with herniated intervertebral disks. They included randomized control trials which involved adult patients with low back pain associated with herniated disk confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, compared lumbar traction to sham or no traction, and provided quantitative measurements of pain and function before and after intervention. Methodological quality was assessed using the physiotherapy evidence database (Pedro) scale and Cochrane risk of bias assessment. Compared with sham or no traction, lumbar traction exhibited significantly more pain reduction and functional improvements in the short term, but not in the long term. In Pakistan most of the physiotherapists used the two-dimensional traction bed for lumbar traction. There is insufficient study on Three-dimensional Traction unit. And there is no literature review is available on comparison of the 2d and 3d traction. To the best of researcher's knowledge, it can be concluded that insufficient literature is available on th

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERmechanical tractionGroup A: This group will get 3-dimensional lumbar traction on multi-dimensional traction bed spine MT. Group B: This group will get 2-dimensional lumbar traction on 2-dimensional traction bed. Common Treatment: Hot pack (for 10 minutes), and US 1mhz for 7 minutes, Mackenzie exercises and cold pack will applied for 15 minutes after traction.

Timeline

Start date
2022-03-01
Primary completion
2023-02-28
Completion
2023-03-31
First posted
2022-05-02
Last updated
2022-05-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05356689. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.