Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05331287

Comparing the "Snifing Position" , "Simple Head Extension" and "Neutral Position"

First Hospital of Qinhuangdao,Hebei Province, China

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The simple head extension is recommended for optimization of glottic visualization during Nasotracheal intubation via fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) . However, no study confirmed its superiority over"snifing position" and "Neutral Position". In a prospective, randomized study, the authors compared the snifing position , simple head extension and "Neutral Position" in Nasotracheal intubation via fiberoptic bronchoscope.

Detailed description

The study included ninety patients with anticipated difficult airways. The snifing position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the head of the patient; the extension head position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the shoulder; the neutral position with the occiput close to the operating table. The head position was randomized as follows: neutral position group (NP group), sniffing position group (SP group) or extension position group (EP group). Randomization (1:1:1) was based on the codes generated by Excel software, which were kept in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes until the began of study.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERHead positionInfluence of different head position on nasal endotracheal intubation

Timeline

Start date
2022-04-20
Primary completion
2022-06-30
Completion
2022-08-30
First posted
2022-04-15
Last updated
2023-02-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05331287. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.