Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05331287
Comparing the "Snifing Position" , "Simple Head Extension" and "Neutral Position"
First Hospital of Qinhuangdao,Hebei Province, China
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The simple head extension is recommended for optimization of glottic visualization during Nasotracheal intubation via fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) . However, no study confirmed its superiority over"snifing position" and "Neutral Position". In a prospective, randomized study, the authors compared the snifing position , simple head extension and "Neutral Position" in Nasotracheal intubation via fiberoptic bronchoscope.
Detailed description
The study included ninety patients with anticipated difficult airways. The snifing position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the head of the patient; the extension head position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the shoulder; the neutral position with the occiput close to the operating table. The head position was randomized as follows: neutral position group (NP group), sniffing position group (SP group) or extension position group (EP group). Randomization (1:1:1) was based on the codes generated by Excel software, which were kept in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes until the began of study.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Head position | Influence of different head position on nasal endotracheal intubation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-04-20
- Primary completion
- 2022-06-30
- Completion
- 2022-08-30
- First posted
- 2022-04-15
- Last updated
- 2023-02-15
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05331287. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.