NCT05320055

Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair

Less Postoperative Pain and Length of Stay After Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Transabdominal Repair With Retro Rectus Mesh Placement (rTARUP) Compared With Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair (IPOM) for Small and Medium-sized Ventral Hernias

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 59 (actual)
• Sponsor: Bispebjerg Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Comparison of results after rTARUP and lap IPOM in patients with small- and medium-sized ventral hernia. Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTARUP or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral and incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural catheter, secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, and length of stay. All patients underwent elective surgery and were followed for 30 days postoperatively.

Detailed description

Single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTARUP or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral and incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural catheter, secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, and length of stay. All patients underwent elective surgery and were followed for 30 days postoperatively.

Conditions

• Hernia, Ventral

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	robotic repair	robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-03-01
• Primary completion: 2021-09-01
• Completion: 2021-10-01
• First posted: 2022-04-11
• Last updated: 2023-08-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Denmark