Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05308251

Comparison of Hernia Sac Ligation Versus Invagination

Comparison of Hernia Sac Ligation Versus Invagination in Lichtenstein Tension Free Mesh Hernioplasty. Does Type of Hernia Have a Role on Outcomes?

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108 (actual)
Sponsor
Samsun Education and Research Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Management of indirect hernial sac in inguinal hernia repairs has long been a subject of debate among general surgeons. Although hernial sac high ligation (HL) is a time-honored concept in groin hernia surgery, non-ligation/invagination is gaining more popularity. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of hernia sac ligation and invagination in patients with Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty (LMH). Also, investigators aimed to investigate the possible association between the hernial defect size and postoperative early pain in both groups.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURELichtenstein Mesh HernioplastyThe inguinal canal was opened and the hernia sac was dissected from the spermatic cord The deep inguinal ring was tightened with one or two polypropylene 2/0 sutures. The posterior wall of the inguinal canal was supported using the standard polypropylene mesh and fixed with 2/0 polyproline. The ilioinguinal nerve, iliohypogastric nerve, and genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve were preserved and care was taken to prevent entrapment.

Timeline

Start date
2020-01-01
Primary completion
2021-01-01
Completion
2022-03-01
First posted
2022-04-04
Last updated
2022-04-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05308251. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.