Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05295082

Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement

Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement: A Randomized Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22 (actual)
Sponsor
Mohammed Ramadan · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

This study will be initiated to compare the accuracy of implant placement using the guided trephination drilling protocol and the guided conventional drilling protocol.

Detailed description

This study will be conducted to compare the accuracy of implant placement using the guided trephination drilling protocol and the guided conventional drilling protocol. the patients with a single missing tooth will be assigned to one group ( trephination drilling / conventional drilling ).the preoperative virtual planning and fabrication of a surgical guide will be made for each patient. after implant placement according to each group, postoperative (CBCT ) will be performed to compare the virtual implant position and the actual implant position.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREguided trephination-based drilling protocolthe implant site preparation in this group will be done by guided trephination protocol which uses the surgical guide to trephine the implant site then remove the guide and continue the drilling in a freehand manner
PROCEDUREguided Conventional drilling-based protocolthe implant site preparation in this group will be done by a guided conventional drilling protocol which uses the surgical guide to guide the sequential drills up to the final drill

Timeline

Start date
2022-04-01
Primary completion
2023-06-20
Completion
2024-04-30
First posted
2022-03-24
Last updated
2024-08-14

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05295082. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.