Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05245630
Comparison of Robotic Arm-assisted PET/CT-guided Lung Biopsy With PET Fused CT- Fluoroscopy-guided Lung Biopsy
Comparison of Real-time Robotic Arm-assisted 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided Lung Biopsy Versus PET Fused CT- Fluoroscopy-guided Lung Biopsy: a Randomized Trial to Assess Diagnostic Performance and Patient Safety.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 59 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Patients with suspicious lung lesions were undertaken for PET/CT directed under CT fluoroscopy lung biopsy or robotic-assisted biopsy. The biopsy planning including patient positioning was done after F18-FDG PET/CT whole body or regional imaging of the patient. Written consent was obtained and the patient will be prepared for the biopsy. Lung biopsies were done using a semi-automatic biopsy gun under the imaging guidance (PET fused CT fluoroscopy) following aseptic precautions. Follow-up CT scans were taken post-biopsy. The time consumed for the procedure, radiation exposure to the interventionist, complications and diagnostic yield in both the arms were compared.
Detailed description
Patients with clinical suspicion of lung lesions were recruited for FDG PET/CT. Based on the PET/CT findings and clinical details a PET/CT guided biopsy was planned. The patients were assigned to the two arms. In the first arm, participants underwent a robotic-assisted biopsy. In the second arm, participants underwent PET/CT-directed CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy. The biopsy planning including patient positioning was done after F18-FDG PET/CT whole body or regional imaging of the patient. Written consent was obtained and the patient will be prepared for the biopsy. Lung biopsies were done using a semi-automatic biopsy gun under the imaging guidance (PET fused CT fluoroscopy) following aseptic precautions. Follow-up CT scans were taken post-biopsy. The time consumed for the procedure, radiation exposure to the interventionist, complications and diagnostic yield in both the arms were compared.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Robotic arm assisted PET/CT guided biopsy | After preparing the participant for the procedure, the participant was positioned on the PET/CT table with the immobilizer. An automated robotic arm (MAXIO-EX, Perfint healthcare Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India) was used to guide the needle for biopsy. Co-axial 18 G biopsy needle (BARD Biopsy disposable coaxial biopsy needle pack, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Arizona, USA) was inserted according to the orientation planned by the robotic biopsy device. After the location is ensured, the trocar stylet is removed from the coaxial cannula and specimens were retrieved using a semiautomated biopsy gun. A repeat CT chest was acquired two hours after the procedure to rule out post-procedural complications. Complications during the procedure were noted, and immediate management was done. |
| PROCEDURE | PET fused CT-Fluoroscopy guided biopsy | CT fluoroscopy was used to place the biopsy needle to the FDG avid lung lesion |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-31
- Completion
- 2022-01-31
- First posted
- 2022-02-18
- Last updated
- 2022-02-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: India
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05245630. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.