Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05218590

For Nasotracheal Intubation With Video Rigid Stylet, Which Nostril is Better?

For Nasotracheal Intubation With Video Rigid Stylet, Which Nostril is Better? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (actual)
Sponsor
Peking University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

To determine which nostril is more suitable for nasotracheal intubation with video rigid stylet.

Detailed description

Head and neck surgeries usually require nasal intubation, which allows leeway for operative maneuvering in the mouth, pharynx, larynx, and neck. Previous studies have found that the right nostril is more appropriate for nasal intubation using direct laryngoscope or videolaryngoscope. It has been shown that the optical rigid stylet was also an appropriate tool for nasal intubation. However, nasal intubation with rigid optical stylet is technically different from that with laryngoscope. It is unknown whether the choice of nostril could affect the intubation using rigid optical stylet. The main aim is to determine which nostril is more suitable for nasal intubation with video rigid stylet.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEVideo rigid styletNasal intubation was performed using the video rigid stylet.

Timeline

Start date
2022-02-08
Primary completion
2022-04-15
Completion
2022-04-16
First posted
2022-02-01
Last updated
2022-04-29

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05218590. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.