NCT05200884

Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine or Articaine for Molars Affected by MIH

A Comparison the Effectiveness of Anesthesia With Lidocaine 2% or Articaine 4% in Children With Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH)

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 1 / Phase 2
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (actual)
• Sponsor: Tishreen University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 6 Years – 12 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Aims: Comparison of injection pain with lidocaine and articaine in children with MIH . Comparison of the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine during treatment of MIH molars. Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blind clinical study including twenty cooperative children, aged 6-12years old

Detailed description

Background and Aims: Effectively achieving anesthesia is one of the difficulties a dentist faces when treating MIH molar There are no studies comparing the effectiveness of lidocaine and articaine in MIH molar Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blind clinical study including twenty cooperative children , aged 6-12 years old Each child will receive either lidocaine or articaine at their first or second visit.

Conditions

• Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Lidocaine 2%	The child will be injected with lidocaine 2% and After 10 minutes the treatment will be completed , Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and pain after injection and treatment will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale
DRUG	Articaine 4%	The child will be injected with 4% Articaine and After 10 minutes the treatment will be completed , Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and face scale

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-01-22
• Primary completion: 2022-03-25
• Completion: 2022-06-10
• First posted: 2022-01-21
• Last updated: 2022-07-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Syria