NCT05198219

Procedural Efficiency and Organisational Impact of Rhino Laryngoscopes Procedures in Consults

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Ambu A/S · Industry
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the procedure efficiency, organisational and economic impact, and physician evaluation of the conventional reusable rhino laryngoscope vs. Ambu® aScope™ 4 RhinoLaryngo in procedures conducted distally form the ENT department e.g. in the emergency department (ED), intensive care unit (ICU), ward etc., i.e. consults.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to investigate the procedure efficiency, organisational and economic impact, and physician evaluation of the conventional reusable rhinolaryngoscope vs. Ambu® aScope™ 4 RhinoLaryngo in procedures conducted distally from the ENT department e.g. in the emergency department, intensive care unit, ward etc., i.e. consults. The study will be prospective and randomised until 13 procedures have been performed in each group followed by an assessment of the organisational impact and cost comparison of the two technologies. The investigator will track the time and evaluate the device after each procedure. The organisational impact will be accessed by a questionnaire following the study period. A cost comparison will be enabled via tracking all the processes associated with the rhinolaryngoscopes. After tracking all equipment, time, and utilities will be ascribed a cost.

Conditions

• Laryngeal Disease

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Ambu® aScope™ 4 Rhinolaryngo	Patient indication following a rhinolaryngoscopy
DEVICE	Conventional reusable rhinolaryngoscope	Patient indication following a rhinolaryngoscopy

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-01-31
• Primary completion: 2022-04-30
• Completion: 2022-09-01
• First posted: 2022-01-20
• Last updated: 2022-03-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Denmark