NCT05197686

Early-initiated High Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy Among Patients With ARDS in the Course of SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia.

Early-initiated High Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy Among Patients With ARDS in the Course of SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia: Prognosis and Impact on the Respiratory and Cardiovascular Systems.

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 100 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare two methods of oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the course of SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. The initial method of oxygen supply during coronavirus pneumonia is conventional oxygen therapy using a face mask or nasal cannula. However, there have been reports in the literature that early initiation of high-flow oxygen therapy with a nasal cannula is associated with better prognosis. The study we perform is intended to provide reliable evidence for confirmation this hypothesis.

Conditions

• Corona Virus Infection
• ARDS Due to Disease Caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
• Oxygen Deficiency

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Oxygen theraphy with high flow nasal cannule	Oxygen theraphy with high flow nasal cannule
DEVICE	Oxygen theraphy with mask with reservoir	Oxygen theraphy with mask with reservoir

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-01-18
• Primary completion: 2022-06-30
• Completion: 2022-12-31
• First posted: 2022-01-19
• Last updated: 2022-01-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Poland