Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05192265
Efficacy and Safety of Pyronaridine-Artesunate Versus Artemether-Lumefantrine
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Pyronaridine-Artesunate Versus Artemether-Lumefantrine in The Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Malaria Among Children In South-West Nigeria
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2 / Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 172 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of Ibadan · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 3 Months – 144 Months
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
In Nigeria, malaria is the commonest reason for outpatient clinic attendance in childhood and is responsible for about 20% of childhood deaths. The emergence of strains of P. falciparum resistant to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine led to severe worsening of morbidity and mortality from malaria. As a result of resistance to previously used monotherapy, the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2001, recommended that malaria-endemic countries experiencing drug-resistant malaria infection adopt combination therapy. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is preferred to the non-ACT combination. In this randomized open-label clinical trial, the safety and efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of malaria among children aged 3 to 144 months who have microscopically confirmed symptomatic Plasmodium falciparum malaria were compared. The study was carried out at the Oni Memorial Children's Hospital, Ring Road Ibadan. One hundred and seventy-two children between 3 and 120 months who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after obtaining written or witnessed signed informed consent from the parents or guardian. A detailed history and physical examination were carried out on each enrollee. Finger prick blood samples were taken from each enrolee for thick blood smear for malaria parasite, haematocrit, and blood spots on filter paper. Five millilitres of venous blood will be taken from an arm vein for baseline liver function tests, creatinine, and random blood glucose on days 0, 3, 7 and 28. Enrollees were randomized into one of two groups. Group one received pyronaridine-artesunate while group two received artemether-lumefantrine at standard doses. Enrollees were seen daily from days 0-3, and on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. Study drugs were administered supervised at standard dosage on days 0, 1, and 2. History taking, physical examination and blood smears were done at each contact time. Special attention will be paid to adverse effects. Parasite clearance time, fever clearance time and cure rates were compared between the two groups.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Antimalarials, pyronaridine-artesunate | The main interventions investigated are pyronaridine-artesunate granules or tablets (Pyramax™) manufactured by Shin Poong Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea. Pyramax granules come in sachets with each containing 60mg of pyronaridine/20mg of artesunate while Pyramax tablets contain 180mg pyronaridine/60mg artesunate. |
| DRUG | Antimalarials, Artemether + Lumefantrine | Artemether-lumefantrine dispersible tablets (Coartem™, Novartis pharma) twice daily according to body weights. Each dispersible tablet of AL contains 20mg of artemether/120mg of lumefantrine). |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-05-20
- Primary completion
- 2020-12-23
- Completion
- 2020-12-23
- First posted
- 2022-01-14
- Last updated
- 2022-04-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Nigeria
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05192265. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.