Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT05189054

Safety and Efficacy of SBRT in the Reirradiation for Ultra-central Thoracic Malignant Tumors

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
40 (estimated)
Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers

Summary

The reirradiation of thoracic tumor is difficult. The possibility of surgery or re course radiotherapy is very small. In the NCCN guideline, only systemic treatment is recommended. However, the effective rate of systemic treatment is low. SBRT has the characteristics of high dose in tumor target area and low dose in surrounding normal tissues. In theory, SBRT is more conducive to the protection of normal tissues and can potentially be used in the salvage treatment of recurrent lesions after radiotherapy. Even so, SBRT is still controversial in the rescue treatment of recurrent lung cancer after radiotherapy, especially for "ultral-central" lesions close to mediastinal structures (such as bronchus, esophagus and large blood vessels), which have a high probability of fatal side effects. However, a few studies on the application of SBRT in the reirradiation for ultral-central lung cancer have shown acceptable safety and efficacy. Generally speaking, there are few studies on SBRT in the treatment of recurrent ultral-central tumor with limited data. The purpose of this study is to further evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of SBRT in the treatment of recurrent ultral-central tumors after radiotherapy.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
RADIATIONstereotacitic body radiation therapyThe patients were treated with high-dose and low fractionated radiotherapy, using modern precision radiotherapy technology.

Timeline

Start date
2022-05-01
Primary completion
2025-04-30
Completion
2027-04-30
First posted
2022-01-12
Last updated
2023-12-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05189054. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.