Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT05168943

Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
Damanhour Teaching Hospital · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
21 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICENylon (Polyamide) Epidural CatheterNylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter
DEVICEPolyurethane Epidural CatheterPolyurethane Epidural Catheter

Timeline

Start date
2025-07-01
Primary completion
2026-12-15
Completion
2026-12-30
First posted
2021-12-23
Last updated
2026-01-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05168943. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.