Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT05168943
Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Damanhour Teaching Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 21 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Nylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter | Nylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter |
| DEVICE | Polyurethane Epidural Catheter | Polyurethane Epidural Catheter |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-12-15
- Completion
- 2026-12-30
- First posted
- 2021-12-23
- Last updated
- 2026-01-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05168943. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.