Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05161559
Adhesive Performance of Glass Ionomer and Resin Based Adhesive Systems: A 3 Years Prospective Clinical Evaluation
Adhesive Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Based Adhesive Systems
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 35 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study aimed to clinically evaluate the 3-years clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations.
Detailed description
The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances between glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations for 3-years. The research question was as follows: Do glass ionomer adhesives in class V restorations present better clinical performances than resin based adhesive systems according to the modified United States Public Health Service (modified-USPHS) criteria?
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Etching with phosphoric acid gel (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) | Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid gel (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) |
| PROCEDURE | Self-etch adhesive (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan) | No Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid (self-etch technique) (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan) |
| PROCEDURE | Chemical bond adhesive (GC, Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) | Chemical bond with hydroxyapatite crystals of Enamel (GC, Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-08-30
- Primary completion
- 2021-09-10
- Completion
- 2021-10-30
- First posted
- 2021-12-17
- Last updated
- 2021-12-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05161559. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.