Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05152836

The Effect of Vibrotactile Stimulation on Parkinson's Tremor

The Effect of Vibrotractile Stimulation on Parkinson's Tremor - an Explorative Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34 (actual)
Sponsor
Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Tremor in Parkinson's disease is a common and highly burdensome symptom. Recent evidence shows that areas in the brain that are underlying Parkinson's tremor overlap with those that respond to somatosensory stimulation. Applying such stimulation to the tremulous limb might therefore influence tremor-related brain activity and thereby potentially reduce tremor. In this study, the investigators explore this possibility and investigate whether tremor specific vibrotactile stimulation at the wrist of the most affected arm influences tremor severity.

Detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, of which tremor is a common and highly burdensome symptom. The pathophysiology of tremor involves a cerebral network that consists of basal ganglia and a cerebello-thalamo-cortical motor circuit. Emerging evidence suggests that somatosensory input from the tremulous limb to the brain may influence this network. Specifically, tremor-related activity was observed in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, and thalamic cells involved in tremor appear to be responsive to somatosensory stimulation as well. Somatosensory afferents may thus play a role in tremor pathophysiology and could therefore be used as treatment target. Here, the investigators will test this hypothesis by investigating the effect of modulating somatosensory input (with vibrotactile stimulation) on tremor severity. The primary objectives are 1) to test whether rhythmic somatosensory input (vibrotactile stimulation) at tremor frequency reduces tremor power of Parkinson's tremor as compared to vibrotactile stimulation at 1.5 times tremor frequency and 2) whether continuous 80Hz vibrotactile stimulation reduces tremor power as compared to sham stimulation. As secondary objectives, the investigators will test whether the effect of vibrotactile stimulation on tremor power depends on the context in which tremor occurs (rest, cognitive coactivation, posture), whether stimulation at tremor frequency reduces tremor power as compared to sham stimulation, and whether vibrotactile stimulation has an effect on two other common PD symptoms: impaired gait and bradykinesia. The investigators will include 27 patients with Parkinson's disease and rest as well as postural tremor. The intervention involves subtle mechanical vibrations on the wrist or ankles. This is a non-invasive and painless way to provide somatosensory stimuli, in a continuous (80Hz) or rhythmic fashion (brief bursts of 80 Hz at tremor or step frequency). The investigators expect that this study will provide mechanistic insights into if and how somatosensory (vibro-tactile) afferents influence the cerebral tremor circuit in Parkinson's disease, and may provide a solid basis for designing further clinical treatment studies.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEVibrotactile stimulation at tremor frequencyMechanical vibrations are applied at brief bursts of 80Hz that occur at the individual tremor frequency. Vibrations are delivered via a small device, which is worn on the wrist of the most-affected arm.
DEVICEVibrotactile stimulation at tremor frequency*1.5Mechanical vibrations are applied at 80Hz bursts at individual tremor frequency\*1.5. Vibrations are delivered via a small device, which is worn on the wrist of the most-affected arm.
DEVICEVibrotactile stimulation at continuous stimulationContinuous 80Hz stimulation is applied via a small device worn on the wrist of the most-affected arm.
DEVICEVibrotactile stimulation 10% below and above step frequencyThis intervention is applied during assessment of gait. Two devices are worn on both ankles which allows alternating stimulation of both ankles with brief bursts of 80 HZ at the individual step frequency plus or minus 10%.

Timeline

Start date
2021-11-30
Primary completion
2022-05-19
Completion
2022-05-19
First posted
2021-12-10
Last updated
2023-02-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Netherlands

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05152836. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.