Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05087407
Decompression and Drainage Seton in the Treatment of High Complex Anal Fistula
Cutting Seton Versus Decompression and Drainage Seton in the Treatment of High Complex Anal Fistula
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (actual)
- Sponsor
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 21 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the decompression and drainage seton (DADS) and cutting seton (CS) in the treatment of high complex anal fistula.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Decomprssion and drainage seton | Incision the internal sphincter over the fistula tract in intersphinteric space to achieve decompression then drainage seton will be put around external sphincter. |
| PROCEDURE | Cutting seton | Cutting seton is introduced from outside openning to internal openning and encircling the internal and external anal sphincter. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-12-01
- Completion
- 2020-05-01
- First posted
- 2021-10-21
- Last updated
- 2021-10-28
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05087407. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.