Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05063695

Pectus ESC Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Study

Pragmatic Study Comparing Outcomes of Multimodal Epidural and Erector Spinae Catheter Pain Protocols After Pectus Surgery

Status
Unknown
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
220 (estimated)
Sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Investigators hypothesize that Erector spinae catheter pain management protocol would allow patients to have earlier and more effective rehabilitation with decreased length of hospital stay. The aims are to compare LOS between the two groups (epidural and ES groups). Secondary aims are to compare recovery outcomes (mobilization time), time required to do the blocks, pain scores and opioid use during hospitalization and on follow up after discharge until Pain clinic visit, side effects, family satisfaction and readmissions among the two groups. In addition, in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes in subjects who received ESP protocol will be studied.

Detailed description

Retrospective study - Electronic medical records of consecutive patients who underwent pectus surgery between January and December of 2019 (epidural protocol) and those who underwent same procedure between June 2020 to May 2021, will be evaluated. Covariates and outcomes described in sections below will be recorded from EMR. The data included records from flowsheets, pain team notes based on follow up questionnaires administered by phone after discharge until after ESP catheters were removed, as well as pain clinic notes.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERMultimodal Erector spinae catheter protocolPatients either received multimodal epidural or ESP protocol

Timeline

Start date
2021-05-01
Primary completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2024-12-31
First posted
2021-10-01
Last updated
2024-03-13

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05063695. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.