Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05060588
Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan for Hypertensive Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
The Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan on the Short-term Prognosis of Hypertensive Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Qingdao Central Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Studies have demonstrated that the early initiation of ACEI/ARB to patients with acute myocardial infarction is beneficial, especially in patients combined with reduced LVEF or mild-moderate heart failure. Therefore, ACEI/ARB is a traditional treatment for patients post-infarction. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that Sacubitril/Valsartan is more beneficial than Ramipril to patients post-PCI.Besides, Sacubitril/Valsartan is also effective for essential hypertension.This study aims to assess the effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on short-term prognosis in hypertensive patients with acute myocardial infarction compared against Valsartan.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Sacubitril/Valsartan 49/51mg/Tab | patients who meet the inclusion criteria are randomized to receive Sacubitril/Valsartan 24/26 mg once every 12 hours for 6 months |
| DRUG | Valsartan 80mg/Tab | Patients who meet the inclusion criteria are randomized to receive valsartan one tablet every 24 hours for 6 months. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2021-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2022-10-01
- Completion
- 2023-02-01
- First posted
- 2021-09-29
- Last updated
- 2021-09-29
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05060588. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.