Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05020509
Intravascular Injection Rates During Lumbar Medial Branch Block
Comparison of Intravascular Injection Rates During Cervical and Lumbar Medial Branch Block Using Touhy or Quincke Type Needle
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 32 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 79 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare using Toughy needle has an advantage of reducing the incidence of vasucular puncture during lumbar medial branch block.
Detailed description
In previous reports, the use of Toughy needle was thought to reduce the incidence of intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal injection. Blunt needles with a pencil point tip, such as Whitacre needles, are not as sharp at their tip as are Quincke needles, which have bevels. Toughy or blunt needles may therefore be less likely to penetrate a vessel during a procedure. Hence, the investigators postulated the incidence of intravenous uptake would be significantly lower using a Toughy needle than using a Quincke needle for lumbar medial branch block. To confirm the intravascular injection rates, the investigators used the real time fluoroscopy after injection of contrast medium. The goal of this study was to compare the incidence of intravascular injection rate betweeen Toughy and Quincke needles using real time fluoroscopy during lumbar medial branch block
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | medial branch block | lumbar medial branch block |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2021-08-12
- Primary completion
- 2021-10-30
- Completion
- 2021-10-30
- First posted
- 2021-08-25
- Last updated
- 2021-11-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05020509. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.