Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04955067
Deep Learning of Anterior Talofibular Ligament: Comparison of Different Models
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 1,000 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to study the injury of the anterior talofibular ligament by deep learning method and compare a variety of different deep learning models to establish a deep learning method that can accurately identify and grade the injury of anterior talofibular ligament, and obtain a model with better recognition and grading effect.
Detailed description
1. Recognition and segmentation of anterior talofibular ligament based on DenseNet. Densenet was used to recognize the axial T2-fs image, and the image level was the most typical one. The labelimg program based on Python was used to locate the coordinates of the anterior talofibular ligament and then imported into Python for learning. All the data were divided into a training set (70%, and then 30% of the training set was selected as the verification set). The remaining 30% was used as the test set to evaluate the accuracy of model recognition. After identifying the anterior talofibular ligament, the local clipping and amplification are carried out to remove the redundant information. Finally, input the result to the next step. 2. Establishment and comparison of various deep learning models: four deep learning models were established and compared in this study, namely VGG19, AlexNet, CapsNet, and GoogleNet. The models using image fitting alone and those combining with clinical physical examination data were compared for each deep learning model. The diagnostic efficiency between models was expressed by the ROC curve, including AUC, F1 score, etc. the ROC curve was further analyzed by t-test, Delong test, and other statistical methods. In this study, the data were divided into a training set (70%, 30% in the training set as the validation set), and the remaining 30% as the test set to evaluate the classification accuracy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Diagnositic test | The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2021-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-30
- Completion
- 2022-03-30
- First posted
- 2021-07-08
- Last updated
- 2021-07-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04955067. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.