Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04948294
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Using Two Types of Blade in Patients Receiving Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope: Channeled Blade vs. Non-channeled Blade
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 118 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The present study compares two different types of videolaryngoscope blade, which is a channeled and non-channeled blade. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of the type of videolaryngoscope blade on the intubation condition.
Detailed description
In tracheal intubation for general anesthesia, one of the two types of the blade during a video laryngoscopy can be used, one is a channeled blade that has a channel for tracheal tube launching, the other is a non-channeled blade. In the present study, the outcomes by using two types of the videolaryngoscope blade such as the intubation condition, intubation time, first-pass rate, and the incidence of intubation-related complications were compared.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Channeled blade | In the present group, a tracheal tube was launched in the channel of the blade before tracheal intubation |
| DEVICE | Non-channeled blade | In the present group, a tracheal tube was not launched in the videolaryngoscope blade before tracheal intubation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-08-22
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-15
- Completion
- 2021-12-31
- First posted
- 2021-07-01
- Last updated
- 2023-10-27
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04948294. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.