Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04948294

Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades

Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Using Two Types of Blade in Patients Receiving Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope: Channeled Blade vs. Non-channeled Blade

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118 (actual)
Sponsor
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The present study compares two different types of videolaryngoscope blade, which is a channeled and non-channeled blade. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of the type of videolaryngoscope blade on the intubation condition.

Detailed description

In tracheal intubation for general anesthesia, one of the two types of the blade during a video laryngoscopy can be used, one is a channeled blade that has a channel for tracheal tube launching, the other is a non-channeled blade. In the present study, the outcomes by using two types of the videolaryngoscope blade such as the intubation condition, intubation time, first-pass rate, and the incidence of intubation-related complications were compared.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEChanneled bladeIn the present group, a tracheal tube was launched in the channel of the blade before tracheal intubation
DEVICENon-channeled bladeIn the present group, a tracheal tube was not launched in the videolaryngoscope blade before tracheal intubation

Timeline

Start date
2018-08-22
Primary completion
2021-12-15
Completion
2021-12-31
First posted
2021-07-01
Last updated
2023-10-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04948294. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.