Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT04940949

A Study to Evaluate Lu AF90103 in Healthy Men

Interventional, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Ascending Dose Study Part Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic and -Dynamic Properties of Lu AF90103 and a Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study Part Investigating the Safety Profile After Infusion of Lu AF90103 at Two Rates to Healthy Men

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15 (actual)
Sponsor
H. Lundbeck A/S · Industry
Sex
Male
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and tolerability of Lu AF90103 and what the body does to Lu AF90103 after single doses of the drug administered directly into a vein.

Detailed description

This study is the first-in-human (FIH) study with Lu AF90103. The study is divided in two parts, Part A and Part B. Part A is an interventional, randomized, double-blind, sequential-group, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Lu AF90103 in healthy men. Part B is an interventional, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study to investigate the safety profile after administration of Lu AF90103 as an infusion at two different rates to healthy young men. The dosage in Part B is guided by the cohorts in Part A and is a repetition of one of the doses from Part A. The total study duration per participant from baseline to the end of follow-up will be maximum 11 days in Part A and 16 days in Part B.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGLu AF90103Lu AF90103 - powder for solution for infusion
DRUGPlaceboPlacebo - powder for solution for infusion

Timeline

Start date
2021-05-26
Primary completion
2021-11-23
Completion
2021-11-23
First posted
2021-06-28
Last updated
2023-03-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Netherlands

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04940949. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.