Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04936516
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
Effectiveness Comparison Between McGrath and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 68 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Udayana University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Tracheal intubation is commonly performed using a standard Macintosh blade, but recently there has been advanced technology using video laryngoscopy (VL).In this modern era, there are various types of available VL to make it easier for anesthesiologists to perform intubation, especially in patients with difficult airway anatomy. Various studies showed different results regarding the effectiveness of both C-MAC® and McGrath®, by assessing the comparison of the effectiveness, valuable information will be obtained for further consideration by experts in choosing the best tools in the future.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Endotracheal intubation | Endotracheal intubation using either McGrath or C-MAC video laryngoscopy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2021-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-09-30
- Completion
- 2021-10-14
- First posted
- 2021-06-23
- Last updated
- 2021-10-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Indonesia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04936516. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.