Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04921579
Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion
Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Future University in Egypt · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 14 Years – 24 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Brief summary: there's a scarcity in literature concerning time needed to retract anterior segment following premolars extraction. the purpose of this study is to determine, in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which form of technique of retraction offers a faster treatment duration of retraction : en-masse or two step techniques
Detailed description
Anterior segment retraction can be done in one of two ways: through En masse or two step techniques. Both are viable options, but, ideally, the investigator wanted to retract and complete the orthodontic treatment as quickly as possible, in order to decrease the negative effects that may occur during treatment. Which of these techniques results in a decreased treatment time is still up for debate.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | En masse retraction | Retraction stated on a 0.017''x 0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 200 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the mini-screw. |
| PROCEDURE | Two-Step retraction | Retraction of canine started on a 0.017''x0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 150 g per side) followed by anterior teeth retraction on 0.017''x0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 160 g per side) extending between crimpable hooks and the mini-screw. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-12-15
- Primary completion
- 2021-01-21
- Completion
- 2021-01-21
- First posted
- 2021-06-10
- Last updated
- 2021-06-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04921579. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.