Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04921579

Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion

Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30 (actual)
Sponsor
Future University in Egypt · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
14 Years – 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Brief summary: there's a scarcity in literature concerning time needed to retract anterior segment following premolars extraction. the purpose of this study is to determine, in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which form of technique of retraction offers a faster treatment duration of retraction : en-masse or two step techniques

Detailed description

Anterior segment retraction can be done in one of two ways: through En masse or two step techniques. Both are viable options, but, ideally, the investigator wanted to retract and complete the orthodontic treatment as quickly as possible, in order to decrease the negative effects that may occur during treatment. Which of these techniques results in a decreased treatment time is still up for debate.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREEn masse retractionRetraction stated on a 0.017''x 0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 200 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.
PROCEDURETwo-Step retractionRetraction of canine started on a 0.017''x0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 150 g per side) followed by anterior teeth retraction on 0.017''x0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 160 g per side) extending between crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.

Timeline

Start date
2019-12-15
Primary completion
2021-01-21
Completion
2021-01-21
First posted
2021-06-10
Last updated
2021-06-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04921579. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.