NCT04810286

Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances

Comparison of Prefabricated Myofunctional Appliances and 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances in Children With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 120 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Ordu University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 8 Years – 12 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

Detailed description

This study aims to investigate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

Conditions

• Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance	To evaluate soft- and hard-tissue changes Class II division 1 tchildren with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printed myofunctional appliance.

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-06-01
• Primary completion: 2023-06-01
• Completion: 2023-11-01
• First posted: 2021-03-22
• Last updated: 2021-03-22

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)