NCT04787341

PAnitumumab REchallenge Followed by REgorafenib Versus the Reverse Sequence

Randomized Phase II Study of Panitumumab Rechallenge Followed by Regorafenib Versus the Reverse Sequence in RAS and BRAF Wild-type Chemorefractory Mestastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 2
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 214 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Gruppo Oncologico del Nord-Ovest · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The association of doublet chemotherapy (FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) and anti-EGFR-moAbs (panitumumab or cetuximab) is a standard option for the first-line treatment of unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients, especially with left-sided primary tumour. In RAS wt mCRC patients refractory to chemotherapy and anti-EGFR naive, the standard treatment sequence is an anti-EGFR-based therapy (panitumumab or cetuximab +/- irinotecan) followed by regorafenib. In a phase II randomized Japanese study named REVERCE, a higher OS was reported in favour of an experimental strategy of regorafenib followed at progression by cetuximab +/- irinotecan compared with the reverse standard sequence in chemorefractory and anti-EGFR-naïve, RAS wt mCRC patients. However, the limitations of the REVERCE study (phase II trial with a premature conclusion for poor accrual) do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions. In addition, nowadays, patients candidates to an anti-EGFR-based treatment, receive anti-EGFRMoAbs in earlier lines of therapy thus affecting the translation of these results in the current clinical practice. Retrospective analyses and a phase II single-arm trial showed promising activity of anti-EGFR rechallenge in patients who previously achieved benefit from a first-line anti- EGFR-based treatment and not bearing RAS mutation on ct-DNA at the rechallenge baseline. Based on these considerations, the Investigators designed the present phase II randomized study of panitumumab followed at progression by regorafenib versus the reverse sequence in RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients with the following characteristics: 1. previous treatment with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and an anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab or aflibercept); 2. RECIST response or stable disease lasting at least 6 months to a previous first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment; 3. RAS and BRAF wt ct-DNA at the time of screening. The aim of this study is to compare the two sequences in a Caucasian population of patients candidates to anti-EGFR rechallenge.

Conditions

• Colorectal Cancer

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Regorafenib	regorafenib administered until progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient's refusal followed after progression by panitumumab until further progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient's refusal in RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients with the following characteristics: 1. previous treatment with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab or aflibercept); 2. RECIST response or stable disease lasting at least 6 months to a previous first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment; 3. RAS and BRAF wt ct-DNA at the time of screening.
DRUG	Panitumumab	panitumumab administered until progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient's refusal followed after progression by regorafenib until further progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient's refusal in RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients with the following characteristics: 1. previous treatment with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab or aflibercept); 2. RECIST response or stable disease lasting at least 6 months to a previous first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment; 3. RAS and BRAF wt ct-DNA at the time of screening.

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-12-15
• Primary completion: 2025-08-07
• Completion: 2026-03-31
• First posted: 2021-03-08
• Last updated: 2026-02-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy