NCT04784078

Randomized Comparison of Distal Radial Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 938 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Beijing Anzhen Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 100 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Distal radial access (dTRA) represents a novel site for radial artery access in interventional cardiology, there is little data compare dTRA with conventional radial access (cTRA) in a randomized manner. It aims to randomly compare between the new distal radial access via the snuffbox and the conventional radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and angioplasty procedures. The objectives of comparing both procedures are to analyze the frequency of complications in terms of occlusion, arterial spasm, hematoma, and to weigh accesses effectiveness in terms of time and attempts to puncture, crossover rate, procedure duration, hemostasis time. Candidates for coronary angiography are being randomized into the interventional group to undergo the angiography through the distal radial artery as the access site, or the control group accessing through the radial artery. Procedural and post procedural outcomes and complications are being reported while patients are in hospital. All patients undergo doppler ultrasonography within 24 hours before and after the procedure, 4 weeks after procedure.

Conditions

• Coronary Disease

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Coronary Angiography and Intervention	Transradial access puncture site

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-04-10
• Primary completion: 2021-12-31
• Completion: 2022-01-31
• First posted: 2021-03-05
• Last updated: 2021-04-13