NCT04778943

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 130 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Tang-Du Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 50 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The investigators will retrospectively study lumbar spinal stenosis patients who underwent OLIF or MIS-TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between January 2016 and December 2019.The investigators will measure estimated blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, cost, reoperation, and complication incidence, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, discal and foraminal height, lumbar lordotic angle, and fusion status.The investigators will conduct to evaluate postoperative improvements, complications, and reoperation rates between patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) undergoing oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) or minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

Conditions

• Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Surgery(OLIF and MIS-TLIF)	oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF); minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-02-28
• Primary completion: 2021-03-25
• Completion: 2021-03-29
• First posted: 2021-03-03
• Last updated: 2021-03-03