Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04759300
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Predicted Difficult Airway: Randomized Comparative Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 160 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Alexandria University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Videolaryngoscopy provides a better laryngeal view and do not need airway alignment for tracheal intubation.
Detailed description
The C-MAC-VS can be connected easily to the same C- MAC monitor and Pocket Monitor without requiring any additional light source and camera. This device is great for cases with limited mouth opening, airway obstruction and difficult intubation. C-MAC-VS has no lumens so it's very easy to clean and it can accommodates a size ETT 6.0 and greater.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | C-MAC VS | patients undergoing tracheal intubation using the C-MAC VS |
| DEVICE | C-MAC VL D -blade | patients undergoing intubation using the C-MAC VL D-blade. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-01-10
- Primary completion
- 2022-05-01
- Completion
- 2022-07-01
- First posted
- 2021-02-18
- Last updated
- 2022-06-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04759300. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.