Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT04759300

Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation

Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Predicted Difficult Airway: Randomized Comparative Study

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160 (estimated)
Sponsor
Alexandria University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Videolaryngoscopy provides a better laryngeal view and do not need airway alignment for tracheal intubation.

Detailed description

The C-MAC-VS can be connected easily to the same C- MAC monitor and Pocket Monitor without requiring any additional light source and camera. This device is great for cases with limited mouth opening, airway obstruction and difficult intubation. C-MAC-VS has no lumens so it's very easy to clean and it can accommodates a size ETT 6.0 and greater.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEC-MAC VSpatients undergoing tracheal intubation using the C-MAC VS
DEVICEC-MAC VL D -bladepatients undergoing intubation using the C-MAC VL D-blade.

Timeline

Start date
2022-01-10
Primary completion
2022-05-01
Completion
2022-07-01
First posted
2021-02-18
Last updated
2022-06-01

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04759300. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.