NCT04757623

COMPARISON OF PURSE-STRING CLOSURE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PRIMARY CLOSURE FOLLOWING STOMA REVERSAL TO REDUCE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATE"

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 140 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Combined Military Hospital, Pakistan · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The study will be carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore for one year . . Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy will be randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients will be called for follow up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups will be checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay.

Detailed description

The study will be carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital. It will be a randomized control trial. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients will be called for follow-up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups will be checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay. The data will be statistically analyzed by using SPSS v23.0.t test (independent sample) used for the comparison of hospital stay mean. Chi-square will also used for the comparison of the frequencies of SSI. Data were stratified for gender and age. A p-value ≤0.05 will be considered as significant.

Conditions

• Surgical Site Infection
• Difference in Surgical Site Infection According to Gender and Age Groups

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Purse string closure of Ileostomy	conventional proceedure

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-02-16
• Primary completion: 2022-02-16
• Completion: 2022-03-16
• First posted: 2021-02-17
• Last updated: 2021-02-17

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Pakistan