Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04695444

Effect of Different Nasotracheal Tubes on Tube Passage

Comparison of the Effect of Tube Type and Intubation Technique on Nasopharyngeal Passage During Nasotracheal Intubation

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150 (actual)
Sponsor
Gangnam Severance Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of the study is to find out the clinical effects that can be obtained during nasotracheal intubation when using velvet-soft PVC tube compared to conventional polyvinylchloride(=PVC) tube.

Detailed description

The hypothesis of this study is that the velvet-soft PVC tube can advanced from the nasal cavity to the oral cavity through the posterior wall of the pharynx more smoothly than conventional PVC tube, thus reducing blockade of tube advancement, nasal/pharyngeal mucosal bleeding, and intubation time. In addition, investigators would like to compare the technique of nasal intubation using by connecting rubber suction catheter to PVC tube tip.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEnasotracheal tube (Ring-Adair-Elwin)different materials for nasotracheal intubation conventional PVC tube
DEVICEnasotracheal tube (Ring-Adair-Elwin)different materials for nasotracheal intubation conventional PVC tube with rubber suction catheter
DEVICEnasotracheal tube (portex)different materials for nasotracheal intubation velvet soft PVC tube.

Timeline

Start date
2021-01-08
Primary completion
2022-11-04
Completion
2022-11-04
First posted
2021-01-05
Last updated
2022-12-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04695444. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.