Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04687891
Transabdominal Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound to Assess the Thickness of the Lower Uterine Segment.
Transabdominal Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound to Assess the Thickness of the Lower Uterine Segment at Term in Women With Previous One Cesarean Section.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 130 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 20 Years – 40 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
aims to determine the accuracy of measurement of the LUS thickness by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy in comparison to the actual thickness of LUS measured with manual caliper measurement during cesarean delivery. Study hypothesis: In women with previous cesarean delivery, determination of the LUS thickness can be done by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy and compared to the actual thickness of LUS measured with a manual caliper at cesarean delivery. Study question: considering transabdominal \& transvaginal ultrasound, which of them would be more accurate in the assessment of LUS thickness?
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | transabdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound | Within a week before scheduled delivery,antepartum transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound will be performed with moderately full bladder. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-12-30
- Completion
- 2020-12-31
- First posted
- 2020-12-29
- Last updated
- 2021-07-29
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04687891. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.