NCT04686656

Nasal Versus Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Nasal With Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 60 (actual)
• Sponsor: Antalya Training and Research Hospital · Other Government
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 90 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare to nasal and buccal oxygen administration in patients undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration .

Detailed description

Anesthesia for Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) may be range from routine bronchoscopy sedation to general anesthesia. During sedation to EBUS increased duration of anesthesia and sedative dosing put patients at increased risk for hypoxic events. To avoid this, oxygen supplementation is mandatory. There are different techniques for oxygen supplementation during the procedure. At this study we will compare to nasal and buccal oxygen supplementations during EBUS.

Conditions

• Lung Diseases

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	nasal oxygen	Nasal cannula will be placed by the anesthesiologist. 6 l/ min of supplemental oxygen will be administered with nasal cannula.
OTHER	buccal oxygen	Ring-adair-elwyn (RAE) tube will be placed by the anesthesiologist. 6 l/ min of supplemental oxygen will be administered with RAE tube.

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-12-24
• Primary completion: 2021-02-24
• Completion: 2021-04-06
• First posted: 2020-12-29
• Last updated: 2021-04-08

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)