Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04622852
Pegs for Osteofixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures
Are Pegs Better Than Screw for Osteofixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures?
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 38 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 55 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Patients treated operative for Proximal humeral fractures with angular stable device (Philos plate or ALPS-PHP)
Detailed description
From a cohort of patients treated for displaced Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) in the period July 2017 - August 2019 patients with the 11-B2 and 11-C2 PHF according to AO/OTA 2007 fracture classification were selected according to age and gender to be compared with patients operated with a Philos plate within the same fracture group, age and gender to be matched for adverse events: 1. Radiographic evidence of penetration of pegs (ALPS-PHP) or screws (Philos) into the glenohumeral joint (primary outcome) and 2. Avascular head necrosis / sinking / need of re-surgery 3. Clinical PROMS
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with an angular stable plate | Operative treatment of proximal humeral fracture |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-09-01
- Completion
- 2021-08-01
- First posted
- 2020-11-10
- Last updated
- 2021-09-14
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Norway
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04622852. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.