Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT04609709
HVLAT, Electric DN, Exercise Vs. Mobilization, STM, Exercise, TENS for Tension Type Headaches
Thrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling and Exercise Vs. Non-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENS for Tension Type Headache Sufferers
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 110 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with tension-type headaches: thrust Manipulation, electric dry Needling and exercise Vs. non-thrust mobilization, soft-tissue mobilization, exercise and TENS. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat tension-type headaches. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.
Detailed description
Patient will tension-type headaches will be randomized to receive 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks (up to 8-12 sessions total) of either: 1. thrust Manipulation, electric dry Needling and exercise or 2. non-thrust mobilization, soft-tissue mobilization, exercise and TENS
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Thrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling and Exercise | Thrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling |
| OTHER | Non-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENS | Non-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENS |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-10-31
- Primary completion
- 2026-05-01
- Completion
- 2026-05-01
- First posted
- 2020-10-30
- Last updated
- 2025-05-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04609709. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.