Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT04609709

HVLAT, Electric DN, Exercise Vs. Mobilization, STM, Exercise, TENS for Tension Type Headaches

Thrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling and Exercise Vs. Non-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENS for Tension Type Headache Sufferers

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110 (estimated)
Sponsor
Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with tension-type headaches: thrust Manipulation, electric dry Needling and exercise Vs. non-thrust mobilization, soft-tissue mobilization, exercise and TENS. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat tension-type headaches. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.

Detailed description

Patient will tension-type headaches will be randomized to receive 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks (up to 8-12 sessions total) of either: 1. thrust Manipulation, electric dry Needling and exercise or 2. non-thrust mobilization, soft-tissue mobilization, exercise and TENS

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERThrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling and ExerciseThrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling
OTHERNon-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENSNon-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENS

Timeline

Start date
2020-10-31
Primary completion
2026-05-01
Completion
2026-05-01
First posted
2020-10-30
Last updated
2025-05-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04609709. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.