Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04568629
ADJUST: A Study on MDT Prognostication
Study of Advice and Decision-making on Prognosis Using the Judge-advisor System Within Multi-disciplinary Teams (ADJUST)
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 323 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University College, London · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study investigates how clinicians form intuitive judgements about the prognoses of palliative care patients after receiving advice perceived as coming from either a team member or an algorithm.
Detailed description
Using the Judge-Advisor System, the investigators will recruit clinicians working in palliative care for adults. Participants will be asked to complete an online survey and review five patient summaries ("vignettes") based on real cases derived from a previous study. Clinicians will be presented with key prognostic information and will be asked to provide an estimate of the probability that the patient will survive for two weeks (0-100%). After providing this initial estimate, participants will receive prognostic advice. While in reality all participants will receive the same advice, participants will be randomised into two groups and these groups will be informed that the advice is either: (1) provided by an algorithm; or (2) provided by a team colleague. Participants will then be given the opportunity to give a second, possibly revised estimate in the light of the advice received.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Advice from the PiPS-B14 prognostic tool | Participants were informed that prognostic advice came from the PiPS-B14 prognostic tool. PiPS-B14 is a validated prognostic algorithm that has been shown to be as accurate as an agreed multi-professional survival estimate. Participants were further informed that in a previous study the PiPS-B14 risk categories for predicting two-week survival were as accurate as a doctor's or a nurse's prediction. |
| OTHER | Advice from another clinician | Participants were informed that prognostic advice came from another clinician. Doctors were told that advice was from a nurse, whereas nurses or other types of HCPs were told that advice was from a doctor. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-10-15
- Primary completion
- 2021-04-13
- Completion
- 2021-04-13
- First posted
- 2020-09-29
- Last updated
- 2022-01-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04568629. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.