Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04568629

ADJUST: A Study on MDT Prognostication

Study of Advice and Decision-making on Prognosis Using the Judge-advisor System Within Multi-disciplinary Teams (ADJUST)

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
323 (actual)
Sponsor
University College, London · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

This study investigates how clinicians form intuitive judgements about the prognoses of palliative care patients after receiving advice perceived as coming from either a team member or an algorithm.

Detailed description

Using the Judge-Advisor System, the investigators will recruit clinicians working in palliative care for adults. Participants will be asked to complete an online survey and review five patient summaries ("vignettes") based on real cases derived from a previous study. Clinicians will be presented with key prognostic information and will be asked to provide an estimate of the probability that the patient will survive for two weeks (0-100%). After providing this initial estimate, participants will receive prognostic advice. While in reality all participants will receive the same advice, participants will be randomised into two groups and these groups will be informed that the advice is either: (1) provided by an algorithm; or (2) provided by a team colleague. Participants will then be given the opportunity to give a second, possibly revised estimate in the light of the advice received.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERAdvice from the PiPS-B14 prognostic toolParticipants were informed that prognostic advice came from the PiPS-B14 prognostic tool. PiPS-B14 is a validated prognostic algorithm that has been shown to be as accurate as an agreed multi-professional survival estimate. Participants were further informed that in a previous study the PiPS-B14 risk categories for predicting two-week survival were as accurate as a doctor's or a nurse's prediction.
OTHERAdvice from another clinicianParticipants were informed that prognostic advice came from another clinician. Doctors were told that advice was from a nurse, whereas nurses or other types of HCPs were told that advice was from a doctor.

Timeline

Start date
2020-10-15
Primary completion
2021-04-13
Completion
2021-04-13
First posted
2020-09-29
Last updated
2022-01-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04568629. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.