Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04535089

Opioid Sparing Analgesia: Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Intracranial Surgeries in Children

Opioid Sparing Analgesia: Intraoperative Infusion Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Intracranial Surgeries in Children

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64 (actual)
Sponsor
Zagazig University · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
6 Years – 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Perioperative pain control is necessary in children as inadequate treatment may lead to progression of perception of pain and development of chronic pain in the future. Anesthetists tend to adopt approach to perioperative control of pain by non-opioid drugs that mediate pain modulation. Its use as opioid sparing analgesia in different surgeries leading to mixed results.

Detailed description

Site of study: This study will be carried out in neurosurgical operating rooms of Zagazig University Hospitals. b. Sample size: A pilot study was done to estimate percent of children need intraoperative fentanyl was (10%) for dexmedetomidine group, and ( 40%) for lidocaine group, at 0.05 α error and 0.2 β error . Sample size was calculated using Open Epi software, is 32 children in each group.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGDexmedetomidine injectionreceive IV bolus dose of 0.5 ug/kg dexmedetomidine diluted in 10ml saline 1% over 15 minutes followed by continuous infusion of 0.5 ug/kg/h
DRUGLidocaine IvIV bolus dose of 1mg/kg lidocaine 1% over 15 minutes followed by continuous infusion of 1.5mg/kg/h

Timeline

Start date
2020-10-01
Primary completion
2021-10-01
Completion
2021-10-01
First posted
2020-09-01
Last updated
2021-12-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04535089. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.